?

Log in

No account? Create an account
So anyway,
Because what the Net really needs is another person sharing his uninformed views
Theatre review: My City 
6th-Oct-2011 11:24 pm
Theatrelandavatar
My City is TV and film writer Stephen Poliakoff's much-anticipated return to the stage after 12 years, but although I avoided actual reviews as usual, I got the impression that people had been largely unenthusiastic about the play itself. Though not a modern classic I found it to be well worth seeing, and when it's good it's very good. Richard (gorgeous Tom Riley) is walking home from a party one night when he sees a woman apparently sleeping on a bench. She turns out to be his former primary school headmistress, Miss Lambert (Tracey Ullman,) a woman whose inspirational teaching helped him partly overcome his ADHD as a child. Joined by his slightly-less-enthusiastic former classmate Julie (a very funny turn from Siân Brooke) he meets up with Miss Lambert a couple of nights later to try and get to the bottom of her dusk-to-dawn walks around London. But she's also brought some people along: Back at school she'd enlist fellow teachers Minken and Summers (David Troughton and Sorcha Cusack) to help her tell stories at Assembly. Now retired, these sidekicks still pop up sometimes on her nighttime wanderings.

As well as the theme of inspirational teachers, a passion for storytelling is the other starting point of the play, and while we sometimes flash back to the stories they told at school assembly, mostly we're in the present where Miss Lambert's preference has taken a turn to spookier or more macabre tales. There's something eerie and ghostly about this trio of retired teachers too, and by the interval you start to wonder exactly what their plans are for their former students. Between the two acts we were discussing the play and Jan's prediction that the play's supernatural subtext would become more literal turned out to be wrong, but I'd have preferred it if he'd been right, or at least a tight plot twist of that nature. The conclusion we do get isn't unsatisfying as such, but it did feel like a lot of little comments made earlier on would reveal a deeper meaning, so it was disappointing when they didn't.

Afterwards Jan said I should quote his verdict as being that the play was less than the sum of it's parts, but that those parts were very good. I can't argue with that, indeed whether charming, spooky or moving most of the stories were beautifully told. In fact I think this is where some of my sense of disappointment came from, the individual tales were sometimes so absorbing it was a jolt to come out of them into a framework that wasn't quite hanging together. There's no complaints as far as the acting's concerned, all the way up from Hannah Arterton's trio of very different waitresses serving the group as the night goes on, to Brooke's funny and grounded Julie, Cusack's enigmatic Summers and Troughton's memory-hoarding Minken. Ullman's mysterious central figure is a mix of the steely and the playful, and it's easy to see why someone made the casting decision to go for an actress best known for character comedy to play someone whose storytelling requires her to take on so many roles; while Riley impresses when his character comes to the fore in the second half. There's some absolutely beautiful moments in here even if the whole doesn't quite fit together. And in those moments that don't work as well, you can at least stare at Tom Riley's jeans.

My City by Stephen Poliakoff is booking until the 5th of November at the Almeida Theatre.
Comments 
7th-Oct-2011 12:08 pm (UTC)
There's something eerie and ghostly about this trio of retired teachers too, and by the interval you start to wonder exactly what their plans are for their former students

I don't mind admitting I was slightly disappointed when no one was cooked in a stew. There was something SO off about the teachers that it was quite disappointing when it turned out that they were just, y'know, old and disillusioned and sometimes cross.
7th-Oct-2011 12:12 pm (UTC)
Also! I thought there was something up with the way the teachers didn't seem to *actually* remember Richard and Julie until after they'd introduced themselves or filled in the gaps. Bit of a comedown when it turned out they really did remember them and weren't just cunningly pretending for some reason or other.
7th-Oct-2011 01:53 pm (UTC)
The main thing that annoyed me about that was that it was so obvious, and Richard and Julie were too thick to notice it. "You won't remember me, but my name's Richard and I had to stay behind for my ADHD." "Oh yes, Richard, I remember you staying behind for your ADHD." "Oh my god! You remember me!"

The supernatural overtones were oddly done. I mean I get what he was doing with having things become ghostlier as we got deeper into the night then easing back into reality in the hours before daylight, but however structurally neat it is, you're still left with three people who a few hours back were acting overtly suspicious for no real reason. Still, I did like it overall, but it is one of those you feel the need to pick to pieces afterwards.
This page was loaded Nov 25th 2017, 2:00 am GMT.